The One Thing That Separates Leaders from Losers: It’s Not What You Think
There’s a dojo owner I know who’s everything you’d expect from a successful martial arts entrepreneur.
He’s a phenomenal fighter—the kind of technical mastery that takes decades to develop. His businesses are thriving with multiple revenue streams.
By most metrics, he’s winning at life.
But there’s one thing that holds him back from true leadership, and what makes it worse is that he knows exactly what it is but refuses to change.
It’s how he treats people—especially those who can’t do anything for him in return.
The Walk Alone Syndrome
John C. Maxwell once said something that cuts to the heart of leadership:
“He who thinks he leads, but has no followers, is only taking a walk.”
This dojo owner embodies this perfectly.
Despite his skills, success, and authority, people don’t genuinely want to follow him.
They comply because they have to, learn from him because he’s technically excellent, and pay him because his services are valuable.
But true followership?
The kind where people choose to go above and beyond, where they’re genuinely invested in shared success? That’s missing.
And it all comes down to one simple truth that most people in positions of authority never learn: leadership has nothing to do with your title, expertise, or even results. It has everything to do with how you treat people when there’s nothing in it for you.
The Three Types of People
In his groundbreaking book Give and Take, Adam Grant identifies three fundamental approaches to human interaction that determine not just success, but the kind of success you achieve:
The Takers
These are people who see every interaction as a transaction where they need to come out ahead.
They’re always calculating: “What’s in it for me?”
They rarely return favors, and when they do, it’s strategic—designed to extract even more value later.
Takers can be successful in the short term.
They’re often good negotiators, skilled at protecting their own interests, and efficient at extracting value from relationships. But they leave a trail of burned bridges and resentful people behind them.
The Matchers
This is where most people live.
Matchers operate on the principle of reciprocity—they keep score and want things to be “fair.”
If you do something for them, they feel obligated to return the favor. If they do something for you, they expect something back.
Matchers create stable relationships and generally get along well with others.
They follow Robert Cialdini’s principle of reciprocity almost religiously, which makes them predictable and generally trustworthy.
The Givers
Givers contribute without keeping score.
They genuinely enjoy helping others succeed, often putting other people’s interests ahead of their own. They’re motivated by the impact they can have rather than what they can extract from relationships.
Here’s where it gets interesting: in Grant’s research, givers occupied both the bottom and the top of the success ladder.
Some givers were taken advantage of and burned out from giving too much.
But the most successful people—the ones who achieved sustainable success while maintaining strong relationships—were also givers.
The Leadership Paradox
The difference between successful givers and unsuccessful ones isn’t how much they give—it’s how smart they are about their giving.
True leaders are strategic givers who understand that lifting others up creates more value for everyone.
The dojo owner I mentioned falls into the taker category, despite his success.
He treats people well when he needs something from them.
He’s charming with potential customers, respectful to higher-ranking martial artists, and accommodating to people who could help his business.
But watch how he treats:
- The teenager who cleans the mats after class
- The parent who’s struggling to make monthly payments
- The lower-ranking student who asks “too many” questions
- The elderly student who moves slowly through techniques
- Service workers at restaurants when he’s out with successful friends
That’s where his true character reveals itself.
The Waiter Test
There’s an old saying in business circles:
“You can tell everything you need to know about someone by how they treat people who can’t do anything for them.”
Some call it the “waiter test”—how does someone treat restaurant servers, cleaning staff, or customer service representatives?
These interactions reveal character because there’s no strategic advantage to being kind. No potential business benefit. No social status to gain.
The way you treat people when there’s nothing in it for you is the truest measure of your character.
Leaders understand this intuitively.
They treat everyone with basic human dignity because they recognize that:
- Every person has inherent worth regardless of their position or ability to reciprocate
- You never know who someone might become or what connections they might have
- Character is revealed in unguarded moments when you think nobody important is watching
- Creating positive interactions makes the world better for everyone
The Compound Effect of Character
Here’s what the dojo owner doesn’t understand: his treatment of “unimportant” people is actively undermining his potential for greater success.
Students notice how he treats the cleaning staff.
Parents observe his impatience with struggling students.
Other instructors see his condescension toward lower-ranking practitioners.
These observations don’t happen in isolation—they shape how people feel about the entire organization.
True leaders understand that every interaction is a deposit or withdrawal from their leadership account.
When you consistently treat people well regardless of their status, you build:
- Genuine loyalty from people who choose to support you
- Positive word-of-mouth that money can’t buy
- A culture of respect that attracts high-quality people
- Personal integrity that creates inner confidence
- Unexpected opportunities from connections you didn’t know existed
The Leadership Equation
Real leadership can be distilled into a simple equation:
Leadership = Character + Competence + Consistency
Most people focus on competence—developing skills, expertise, and knowledge.
Some work on consistency—showing up reliably and maintaining standards.
But character—how you treat people when there’s no audience, no reward, and no reciprocal benefit—is what transforms competence into true leadership.
The dojo owner has competence in spades.
He’s reasonably consistent in his business practices.
But his character deficit limits his leadership ceiling, regardless of how skilled he becomes or how successful his business appears.
The Ripple Effect
Leadership isn’t just about the people who directly report to you or pay for your services.
True leaders understand that their behavior creates ripple effects that extend far beyond their immediate sphere of influence.
When you treat someone with respect and kindness:
- They’re more likely to treat others the same way
- They tell others about their positive experience
- They become advocates for you and your organization
- They’re motivated to contribute more than the minimum required
When you treat someone poorly:
- They often pass that negative energy on to others
- They share their negative experience (and negative stories spread faster than positive ones)
- They become passive resistors or active detractors
- They do the minimum required and look for opportunities to leave
The Long Game
Takers optimize for short-term gains.
They extract maximum value from each interaction without considering long-term consequences.
This can work for a while, especially if you’re skilled enough to deliver value despite your poor character.
But leadership is a long game.
The people you treat poorly today might be in positions to help or hurt you tomorrow.
The student you dismiss might become a successful business owner.
The parent you’re impatient with might have connections you need.
The lower-ranking practitioner you condescend to might open their own school and compete with you.
Even more importantly, every person you interact with is connected to a network of other people.
In our hyperconnected world, your reputation precedes you in ways that would have been impossible just a generation ago.
The Mirror Test
Here’s a simple exercise:
Think about the last week and identify three interactions you had with people who couldn’t do anything for you.
- How did you treat them?
- What was your internal attitude during these interactions?
- If someone was watching those interactions, what would they conclude about your character?
- Would you want to follow someone who behaved the way you did?
This isn’t about being perfect or pretending to be someone you’re not.
It’s about recognizing that leadership is ultimately about influence, and influence comes from who you are, not just what you can do.
The Choice
Every day, you make dozens of choices about how to treat the people around you.
Most of these choices seem insignificant in the moment, but they’re actually the building blocks of your reputation, character, and leadership capacity.
You can choose to be a giver, matcher, or taker.
You can choose to treat people as instruments for your success or as human beings worthy of respect.
You can choose to optimize for short-term extraction or long-term influence.
The dojo owner I mentioned has made his choice, and it’s limiting his potential impact despite his considerable abilities.
He’s successful, but he could be truly influential if he understood that leadership isn’t about what you can take from people—it’s about what you can give to them.
The Leadership Decision
Real leadership is a decision you make every day in small moments that seem unimportant:
- How you respond when someone makes a mistake
- The tone you use when giving feedback
- Whether you acknowledge people who aren’t essential to your success
- How you handle frustration when someone doesn’t meet your expectations
- What you do when you have power over someone who can’t fight back
These moments reveal who you really are and determine whether people choose to follow you or simply comply with your authority.
The Bottom Line
The difference between leaders and losers isn’t talent, success, or even expertise. It’s character.
You can have all the skills in the world, build a successful business, and achieve impressive results while still being someone that people endure rather than choose to follow.
Or you can recognize that true leadership is about lifting others up, treating everyone with dignity, and understanding that your character in small moments determines your influence in big ones.
The choice is yours.
But remember: if the people behind you won’t follow you, you’re not leading—you’re just taking a very expensive walk by yourself.
Leaders understand that how you treat people when there’s nothing in it for you reveals everything about who you really are.
And who you really are determines whether you’ll have genuine influence or just temporary authority.
Be the person others choose to follow, not the person they have to follow.
That’s what separates leaders from losers, regardless of their title, authority, or expertise.